| Le Parfumeur Rebelle |
| Ever since I read your essay, I have been thinking long and hard about how to respond to this without being overly offensive. I have to admit though, that even if I find a few points to have some standing, I felt almost mortally offended by your views. Why? Because no matter what, I’m a firm believer in proper education, whether it’s in any form of the arts or other subjects. Of course I’m aware of (and have some experience with) how much damage a bad and overly authoritative teacher can assert (especially on the more fragile minds), but still I think the need for education runs deeply, even (or especially) in the art of natural perfumery. While I was musing over how to explain my viewpoints, I got to thinking about the world famous Swedish soprano, Birgit Nilsson, who sadly passed away in December 2005. I willingly confess that I’m no big fan of opera, but if there was ever one woman who I admired to no end, it was La Nilsson. Heavens above, that woman had such a voice that just thinking of it sends shivers down my spine. Ms Nilsson was born with a god given talent, but no woman or man can ever reach these heights in the art of opera without? Proper education! Even if Ms Nilsson said that her first voice teacher almost killed her and number two was almost as bad, still she went ahead and studied at the Royal Swedish Music Academy. If she had given up and stayed away from formal voice education and training – would she have been able to sing in Turandot like none before or after has ever done? I hardly think so. I have a long and quite interesting background, with a lot of different educations and occupations, and some of them artistic. For instance, I went to goldsmith school for three years back in the early 80s. Now goldsmithing is one of the very ancient forms of art (as is perfumery), and the school was run by a rigorous, authoritative and very strict German guy in his middle 50s. You might be led to believe that such a man would erase any hint of creativity any one of us might have harbored in the depths of our souls. But quite the opposite occurred. Of course, we had to learn how to use all the tools and machines, the techniques and everything else that comes with the craft. There were even some “must-do” pre-designed jewels we had to make each year (and ugly as hell they where, left over designs from the 50s and 60s, I guess). But apart from these, we were much encouraged (or more likely forced) to come up with our own ideas and designs – and make them come true. From what I remember, we were pretty much free to create whatever we fancied, to make our own mistakes and learn from them. If that isn’t encouraging to the creative mind, I don’t know what is. I can’t for the life of me figure out why natural perfumery, of all forms of art, ought to be better off without “proper” education? Because for me, natural botanical perfumery is an art, as well as traditional perfumery, and not some home hobby that I can do in whatever way I choose. Sidenote: I’m currently reading “A Scented Palace”by Elisabeth de Feydeau and even at page 25 she says that “no one could be confirmed as a merchand maître gantier perfumeur without having completed four years of apprenticeship followed by three years as a compagnon, in training”. To me, a true perfume is built like they always have been, with base, middle and top notes. Of course it’s OK to create a blend that consists of only base notes or with the addition of some middle ones, but please – don’t call these blends perfumes, because as per definition they are not. On the 17th of July this year, one of my dreams came true – the Fragrance Summer School in Grasse began with me as one of the students. I’m one of the very few natural botanical “perfumers” that took this course (ever since I first found it on the G.I.P website) to my heart, even though it covers not only natural raw materials, but chemical ones as well. I figured out that it could not hurt to get a hunch about how “real” perfumes are made and how the formally educated and trained perfumers work, and that I would probably gain much insight and knowledge about the art of perfumery, that could be well put to use in working with only natural botanicals. And I’m more than happy to say that I was right – so absolutely dead-on-target right! I learned more during these two wonderful weeks than I had reading all these books, articles and web pages written by self-proclaimed “authorities” in the field of natural perfumery. Not only did we learn about quite a few raw materials, how famous fragrances were built, how to classify both raw materials and perfumes, how to re-create given accords and formulas, but we were encouraged to use our own creative and imaginative minds for our versions as well. Imagine being allowed to be free to use any of the several hundred materials that are stocked in the schools laboratory - it was like being a kid set loose in a candy store! We had one of the best teachers I have met in my entire life, the very highly trained and experienced Laurence, who has studied and worked for Givoudan Roure for many years. Not only in the way of passing on knowledge, but for being generous enough to listen to our views and opinions and at times taking them to heart as well. When it came to the creative exercises, we were pretty much set free, but we had to stay within the guidelines of the respective fragrance family we had re-created earlier. So when we had re- created the chypre and were set loose, we still had to keep our creation within the chypre family, but apart from that could take it in any direction we fancied. Even when we made some less than good choices of the raw materials, Laurence didn’t tell us to use something else because our choice wouldn’t work. Instead she just said “Hmm that is an interesting choice, and of course you can try it. But what would you think will happen if you use this or that instead?” Thus steering us away from the worst disasters, but still encouraging us to think through our formulas some more, opening our imagination to new insights and possibilities that at least I would never have thought about. I learned so much and gained so many insights about the art of perfumery during these few magical days in Grasse, that my initial hopes were surpassed a thousand times over. If my private circumstances had been different and – if I had been at least 10 years younger, I would never have hesitated for one single second to go through the application process for the 9 months’ training course for professional perfumers-to-be. Even though my heart more than ever belongs to the word of botanicals, I would have willingly invested money, time and effort into “learning it all” the professional way, and then would have used these skills to advance the art of natural botanical perfumery to new and exiting levels. As it is, I’m still convinced that every single € I spent on the too short, two weeks’ training in Grasse will pay off more than could ever be foreseen. Therefore, I feel pretty confident to encourage anybody with a deeper interest in natural perfumery to not be afraid of classical perfumery education, but to get a head start by applying for the Fragrance Summer School over the years to come. |
| Opposition Essay to 'The Importance of Being Innocent' |
| Natural & Botanical Perfumers Education Interviews Primers Faces of Rebel Perfumers Information Suppliers Grey Page Blogs About LPR Op/Ed Contact LPR |